|
A popular saying already tells an interesting
truth, when it recommends “not to put all your eggs in one basket”, that is
to say spread and hence reduce risks. Also in biology, such strategies are
already known and referred to as “bet-hedging”. In the process of evolution,
bet-hedging is not the usual way of adapting to the environment, in which
carriers of advantageous mutations prevail against other individuals that do
not show these mutations. In fact, bet-hedging means that a generation
produces offspring that is genetically identical, but differs in the ability
to prosper in the current environments: Some offspring is optimally adapted
to the current environment, while others thrive under completely different
conditions. In case of rapid and drastic changes of the environment, the
latter offspring is at an advantage and hence the species survives. The
evolutionary advantage of the bet-hedging strategy increases, the more
drastically and unpredictably the environmental conditions change. Such
risk-spreading mechanisms are, for example, known from bacterial pathogens:
By varying their cell surfaces, genetically identical pathogen cells escape
the human immune system. Further examples of bet-hedging are known from the
animal and plant kingdom. Christian Kost, scientist at the Max Planck
Institute for Chemical Ecology in Jena, Germany, has been working on this
topic. Funded by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, he studied bacteria
of the species Pseudomonas fluorescens at the New Zealand Institute for
Advanced Study in Auckland. Due to their short generation time (cells divide
every 52 minutes), these bacteria are particularly well suited to study
evolution in the test tube. Moreover, the relatively small genome of these
organisms facilitates the detection of new mutations.
Advantageous mutations become
disadvantages
In their experiments the researchers exposed
Pseudomonas strains alternately to unshaken or shaken culture media. Due to
beneficial mutations in the genome, new variants emerged in both
environments that had an advantage in either the “shaken” or “unshaken”
environment. Once emerged, each new variant had to outcompete all other
unmutated representatives of the ancestral strain. Under the assumption that
one variant that differed in its outer appearance from its parent (for
example smooth vs. rough surface) also must have outcompeted the parent
strain, the most frequent representative of this new variant was picked and
transferred to the respective other environment. Mutations that were
advantageous in shaken media became disadvantageous in unshaken environments,
and vice versa. As a consequence, new mutations and hence new variants
evolved to compensate for this disadvantage. As soon as the bacteria adapted
to one environment they were forced to readapt to the second one.
Bet-hedging: One genotype, several
variants
The constant changes between shaken and
unshaken media soon resulted in the development of types with the same
genetic constitution (genotypes), which always produced two different
variants. Once emerged, this was the ultimate survival strategy for the
bet-hedging pseudomonades, for all other genotypes that produced new
variants by mutation only had no chance to prevail against the bet-hedging
variants. Genetic analysis showed that both variants were absolutely
identical on a genetic level. Furthermore, the bet-hedging genotype differed
by nine mutations from the ancestral strain, with which the experiment had
been started. Moreover, the final mutation in the series was causal for
bet-hedging. “Our experiments provide evidence that risk-spreading is a very
successful strategy to rapidly adapt to changing environments. If the same
genotype generates several variants at the same time, it may survive major
environmental changes”, Christian Kost says. And Paul Rainey, principal
investigator of the study at Massey University Auckland, adds: “The rapid
and repeatable evolution of bet-hedging during our experiment suggests it
may have been one of the earliest evolutionary solutions to life in
constantly changing environments“. [JWK/CK]
Citation: Hubertus J.
E. Beaumont, Jenna Gallie, Christian Kost, Gayle C. Ferguson, Paul B. Rainey:
Experimental evolution of bet-hedging. NATURE. DOI: 10.1038/nature08504
Further Information: Dr. Christian
Kost, MPI for Chemical Ecology, Hans-Knoell-Strasse 8, 07745 Jena, Germany,
Tel.:
+49 (0)3641 – 571212,
e-mail
Pictures: Angela Overmeyer, MPI
für chemische Ökologie, Hans-Knöll-Straße 8, 07745 Jena, Tel.: +49 (0)3641 –
572110,
e-mail
PDF of Press Release |